Hey! Welcome to Not Billable, your weekly dose of legal insight and trends. Stop the clock, put the timesheet down and get ready to read a fight over attorney-client privilege, sanctioned fake news, and SBF taking the stand in his criminal trial.
🤐 PRIVILEGE
That's Privileged ↗
A fight over attorney client-privilege has erupted in the FTC v. Amazon case. On Wednesday, the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) filed an amicus brief addressing the issue. Here is the gist of situation:
The FTC alleges in their Amended Complaint violations of the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence ACT (ROSCA) by Amazon. To get monetary penalties, the FTC has to establish that Amazon had “actual knowledge or knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances” that their conduct was unfair or deceptive. Well, to satisfy this element, the FTC has effectively said “Amazon knew it's conducted was bad because they conferred with counsel knowledgeable on ROSCA and the FTC Act.”
According to the ACC, basing liability on privileged conversations with counsel violate the principles of attorney client privilege. It makes sense, especially looking at it through this lens:

THE VERDICT:
The arguments posed by the ACC make a lot of sense. Under the FTC's theory, conversations between companies and their counsel would be immediately open up the company to liability. This likely invades the attorney client privilege and, practically speaking, disincentivizes companies from seeking legal guidance from their attorneys.
POST OF THE WEEK
This week, we asked the world how they would terrify their lawyer in five words.
Terrify your lawyer in 5 words.
— Lawtrades (@LawTrades) October 25, 2023
We received some truly frightening, unhinged responses. Here are a few we enjoyed:
I told the cops everything. =) https://t.co/ygNsMNIC9l
— Alyssa Leader (@alittleleader) October 25, 2023
I already signed it https://t.co/LHC9sxSfEi
— Keeks 🦋 (@DietCoke_Esq) October 25, 2023
Yeah that’s me on video https://t.co/VeKSG3JpSB
— Naomi Sayers, Absolutely Loathsome 💕 (@kwetoday) October 25, 2023
⚖️ Ethics
Fake News? ↗
A story about alleged fake news has made its way around a number of legal circles. According to the American Bar Association Journal, an attorney representing the an heir to the Saudi sheikh is currently battling Chevron Corporation over a 60-year old agreement and a purported $18 billion dollar arbitration award in Egypt (claimed to be a sham by Chevron). In the U.S. case against Chevron, the attorney attempted to submit news article that contained a summary of the events related to the arbitration proceeding. Well, turns out that article was found to be fake.
IT WAS FAKE?
The District Court and 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals explained that the article must have been written by the attorney or someone working for them. Importantly, the 9th Circuit noted that the article contained at least five lengthy passes “taken almost verbatim” from the attorney's filings.
As a result of this finding, the District Court sanctioned the lawyer ($268,000). Here is where things take a twist. The attorney is now suggesting that the sanctions order was not signed or reviewed by the judge and has asked for investigation into Chevron for alleged misconduct.
THE VERDICT:
I think it goes without saying that you should not file anything with the court that is fake or fraudulent (unless that is the reason you are filing it). Especially in a case where a purposed $18 billion dollars are at stake.
🗣️ TESTIMONY
SBF Takes the Stand ↗
While not in front of jurors, SBF took the stand and testified last Thursday. The move was effectively a practice run so that Judge Kaplan could determine what elements of Bankman-Fried's testimony would be admissible. The day was. . . interesting, to say the least.

After providing testimony on Thursday, SBF took the stand in front an actual jury on Friday. As expected, SBF took the position that he did not intend to defraud. Instead, he “made a number of mistakes.”

SOURCE CNN
THE VERDICT:
This case is truly all over the place. While we can't say for sure how it will end, we do expect a pretty entertaining documentary or mini-series to come out of it.
POST OF THE WEEK
This week, we asked the world how they would terrify their lawyer in five words.
Terrify your lawyer in 5 words.
— Lawtrades (@LawTrades) October 25, 2023
We received some truly frightening, unhinged responses. Here are a few we enjoyed:
I told the cops everything. =) https://t.co/ygNsMNIC9l
— Alyssa Leader (@alittleleader) October 25, 2023
I already signed it https://t.co/LHC9sxSfEi
— Keeks 🦋 (@DietCoke_Esq) October 25, 2023
Yeah that’s me on video https://t.co/VeKSG3JpSB
— Naomi Sayers, Absolutely Loathsome 💕 (@kwetoday) October 25, 2023
Be a smarter legal leader
Join 7,000+ subscribers getting the 4-minute monthly newsletter with fresh takes on the legal news and industry trends that matter.